Latvian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,454,154 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 38.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,320,097 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 39.0%, a difference of 0.42%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Latvian	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Minimum	8.4%	5.6%
Maximum	100.0%	67.6%
Range	91.6%	62.0%
Mean	50.8%	41.3%
Median	41.8%	40.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	37.8%	36.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	59.2%	49.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	21.4%	12.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.9%	11.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	23.6%	11.0%

Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from North America (38.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Greek (38.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (38.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (38.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Canada (38.9%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Alaska Native (39.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Puget Sound Salish (39.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Spanish American (39.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Germany (39.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Osage (39.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Spanish	99.7 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 39.3%
Immigrants \| Uganda	99.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 39.2%
Creek	99.6 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 39.1%
Samoans	99.6 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 39.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	99.6 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 39.1%
Puget Sound Salish	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 39.1%
Alaska Natives	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 39.1%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 39.0%
Spanish Americans	99.5 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 39.0%
Osage	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 39.0%
Blackfeet	99.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North America	99.4 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 38.9%
Latvians	99.4 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 38.9%
Greeks	99.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 38.9%
Ugandans	99.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	99.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 38.7%
Hmong	99.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 38.7%
Zimbabweans	99.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	99.0 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 38.7%