Immigrants from Oceania vs Cheyenne In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,018,730 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 37.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,651,378 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222 and weighted average of 37.9%, a difference of 0.020%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Oceania	Cheyenne
Minimum	7.3%	6.9%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	92.7%	93.1%
Mean	44.3%	49.1%
Median	40.9%	46.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	37.3%	31.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	50.0%	58.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	12.7%	27.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.5%	26.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.2%	25.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Cheyenne by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Austria (37.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (38.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Spaniard (38.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (38.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and New Zealander (38.0%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Immigrants from Austria (37.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (38.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Netherlands (37.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Spaniard (38.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and New Zealander (38.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Guamanians/Chamorros	97.4 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 38.2%
Seminole	96.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 38.1%
Immigrants \| England	96.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 38.1%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 38.0%
Africans	95.6 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 38.0%
Choctaw	95.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 38.0%
New Zealanders	95.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 38.0%
Spaniards	95.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 38.0%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	95.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 38.0%
Immigrants \| Austria	95.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 37.9%
Immigrants \| Oceania	94.7 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 37.9%
Cheyenne	94.6 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 37.9%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	93.7 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 37.8%
Macedonians	93.4 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 37.8%
Australians	93.2 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 37.8%
Cajuns	93.2 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 37.8%
Comanche	91.9 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 37.7%
Immigrants \| Moldova	91.9 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 37.7%
Estonians	91.7 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 37.7%
Syrians	90.7 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 37.6%
Sierra Leoneans	89.7 /100 \| #142	Excellent 37.6%