Greek vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Greek
Alaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Greeks
Alaskan Athabascans
64.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
26.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
13.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,783,671 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Greeks and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.564 and weighted average of 64.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 0.22%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Greek | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 23.6% |
| Maximum | 83.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 81.5% | 76.4% |
| Mean | 56.5% | 61.3% |
| Median | 61.7% | 64.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.1% | 51.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 65.0% | 70.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.9% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from Italy (65.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Mexican American Indian (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Haitian (65.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Romanian (65.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Armenian (64.9%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Maltese (64.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Romanians | 31.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 65.0% |
| Haitians | 30.6 /100 | #196 | Fair 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 28.7 /100 | #197 | Fair 65.0% |
| Greeks | 26.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 64.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 23.1 /100 | #199 | Fair 64.9% |
| Armenians | 20.2 /100 | #200 | Fair 64.9% |
| Ukrainians | 19.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 19.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 64.9% |
| Russians | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 64.9% |
| Slovenes | 18.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 64.9% |
| Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
| Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
| Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
| Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
| Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |