African vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
African
Alaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Africans
Alaskan Athabascans
64.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
5.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
13.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,091,127 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Africans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.529 and weighted average of 64.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 0.27%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | African | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 10.3% | 23.6% |
| Maximum | 92.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 82.5% | 76.4% |
| Mean | 58.4% | 61.3% |
| Median | 61.6% | 64.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.4% | 51.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 65.3% | 70.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Africans and Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are British (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Chinese (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%), European (64.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Polish (64.7%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Maltese (64.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Belgian (64.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
| Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
| Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |
| Belgians | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 64.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 64.7% |
| Alsatians | 10.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 64.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Hawaiians | 9.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 8.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Croatians | 8.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Europeans | 8.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Poles | 8.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Northern Europeans | 8.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 64.7% |
| British | 7.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Chinese | 7.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Africans | 5.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 64.6% |