Choctaw vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Choctaw
 Chinese
 In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Choctaw
Chinese
80.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,650,989 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 80.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,807,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 85.1%, a difference of 5.6%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Chinese | 
| Minimum | 50.8% | 64.7% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 49.2% | 35.3% | 
| Mean | 76.4% | 85.0% | 
| Median | 76.0% | 85.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.8% | 83.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 80.4% | 88.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 4.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 5.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 5.6% | 
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Dutch West Indian (80.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Seminole (80.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 81.4%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 81.3%  | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 80.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 80.9%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 80.7%  | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 80.6%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 80.5%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 80.5%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 80.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 80.0%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 79.7%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 79.5%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 79.5%  | 
Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Slovak (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Serbian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Croatia (85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and Turkish (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | 
| Thais | 99.7 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 85.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.7 /100 | #51  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.6 /100 | #52  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Taiwanese | 99.6 /100 | #53  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Turks | 99.5 /100 | #54  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Soviet Union | 99.5 /100 | #55  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.5 /100 | #56  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Chinese | 99.4 /100 | #57  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Slovaks | 99.4 /100 | #58  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Serbians | 99.4 /100 | #59  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Albanians | 99.4 /100 | #60  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 99.3 /100 | #61  | Exceptional 85.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #62  | Exceptional 85.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.3 /100 | #63  | Exceptional 85.0%  | 
| Swedes | 99.2 /100 | #64  | Exceptional 85.0%  |