Serbian vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 35-44

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics

COMPARE

Serbian

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole SenegaleseSerbianShoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Chinese

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw ChileanChineseChippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

In Labor Force | Age 35-44

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison

Serbians

Chinese

Exceptional

85.1%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44

99.4/ 100

METRIC RATING

59th/ 347

METRIC RANK

85.1%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44

99.4/ 100

METRIC RATING

57th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Serbian vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,549,100 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 85.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,807,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 85.1%, a difference of 0.010%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Serbian	Chinese
Minimum	69.6%	64.7%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	30.4%	35.3%
Mean	88.1%	85.0%
Median	86.4%	85.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	84.3%	83.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	95.5%	88.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.2%	4.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.3%	5.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.2%	5.6%

Demographics Similar to Serbians and Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Slovak (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Albanian (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Croatia (85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Soviet Union (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Slovak (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Croatia (85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Turkish (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Soviet Union (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Immigrants \| Eritrea	99.7 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 85.2%
Croatians	99.7 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 85.2%
Thais	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 85.2%
Immigrants \| Albania	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	99.6 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 85.1%
Taiwanese	99.6 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 85.1%
Turks	99.5 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 85.1%
Soviet Union	99.5 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Croatia	99.5 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 85.1%
Chinese	99.4 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 85.1%
Slovaks	99.4 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 85.1%
Serbians	99.4 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 85.1%
Albanians	99.4 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Latvia	99.3 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.3 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	99.3 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 85.0%
Swedes	99.2 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Brazil	99.2 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Haiti	99.1 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Italy	99.1 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 85.0%
Italians	99.1 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 85.0%