British West Indian vs Immigrants from Barbados In Labor Force | Age 20-24

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,699,187 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 70.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,783,156 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.404 and weighted average of 69.7%, a difference of 0.35%.

In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary

Measurement	British West Indian	Immigrants from Barbados
Minimum	51.4%	14.5%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	48.6%	85.5%
Mean	75.5%	69.6%
Median	74.5%	72.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	70.5%	62.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	79.5%	76.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.0%	13.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.5%	12.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.4%	12.1%

Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Immigrants from Barbados by In Labor Force | Age 20-24

In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Yuman (70.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (70.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (70.6%, a difference of 0.94%), Vietnamese (70.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and Immigrants from Guyana (69.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Barbados are Immigrants from Guyana (69.3%, a difference of 0.66%), Yuman (70.3%, a difference of 0.75%), Guyanese (69.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (70.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and Pima (69.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 20-24
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 71.2%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 71.1%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 71.1%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 71.1%
Immigrants \| China	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 71.1%
Yup'ik	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 70.9%
Vietnamese	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 70.6%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 70.6%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 70.4%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 70.3%
British West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 70.0%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 69.7%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 69.3%
Guyanese	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 69.2%
Pima	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 69.0%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 68.9%
Menominee	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 68.7%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 68.6%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 68.4%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 68.3%
Immigrants \| Grenada	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 67.2%