Brazilian vs Latvian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Brazilian
Latvian
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Brazilians
Latvians
80.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Latvian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,965,381 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of 80.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,728,272 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 80.5%, a difference of 0.030%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Latvian |
| Minimum | 57.6% | 40.9% |
| Maximum | 92.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 35.0% | 59.1% |
| Mean | 80.3% | 77.1% |
| Median | 80.8% | 79.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 79.3% | 73.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.2% | 82.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Latvians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (80.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (80.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Liberia (80.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Paraguayan (80.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Moldova (80.6%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Czech (80.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Liberia (80.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (80.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (80.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (80.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Paraguayans | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Ugandans | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Brazilians | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Czechs | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 80.4% |