Immigrants from Barbados vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Barbados
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Barbados
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
63.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Barbados vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,769,646 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167 and weighted average of 63.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,791,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 63.5%, a difference of 0.39%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Barbados | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 42.7% | 31.0% |
Maximum | 91.0% | 89.0% |
Range | 48.2% | 57.9% |
Mean | 66.3% | 66.3% |
Median | 66.6% | 65.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.7% | 60.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.2% | 75.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 15.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Barbados are Icelander (63.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Luxembourger (63.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (63.4%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |
Icelanders | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.7 /100 | #258 | Tragic 63.2% |