Spanish American Indian vs Puget Sound Salish Average Family Size
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Puget Sound Salish
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Puget Sound Salish
3.58
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.17
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Puget Sound Salish Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,145,550 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.178 and weighted average of 3.58. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,155,775 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.17, a difference of 13.1%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Puget Sound Salish |
| Minimum | 2.46 | 2.03 |
| Maximum | 4.29 | 3.59 |
| Range | 1.83 | 1.56 |
| Mean | 3.49 | 3.05 |
| Median | 3.46 | 3.11 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.15 | 2.90 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.90 | 3.25 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.75 | 0.36 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.48 | 0.34 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.47 | 0.34 |
Similar Demographics by Average Family Size
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Hopi (3.60, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Yemen (3.60, a difference of 0.36%), Inupiat (3.63, a difference of 1.2%), Arapaho (3.64, a difference of 1.4%), and Tohono O'odham (3.53, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Pueblo | 100 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.79 |
| Pima | 100 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.75 |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.65 |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.64 |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.63 |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.60 |
| Hopi | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.60 |
| Spanish American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.58 |
| Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 3.53 |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 3.52 |
| Sioux | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 3.52 |
| Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 3.49 |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 3.49 |
| Ute | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 3.49 |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Spain (3.17, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (3.17, a difference of 0.040%), South African (3.17, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.17, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (3.17, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 2.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.18 |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 2.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 3.18 |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 2.7 /100 | #245 | Tragic 3.18 |
| Danes | 2.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 3.17 |
| Cajuns | 2.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.17 |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 2.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.17 |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 2.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.17 |
| Puget Sound Salish | 1.9 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.17 |
| Immigrants | Spain | 1.8 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.17 |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.17 |
| South Africans | 1.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.17 |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 1.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 3.17 |
| Cape Verdeans | 1.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.17 |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 1.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.17 |
| Albanians | 1.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 3.17 |