Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chickasaw Average Family Size

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,601,070 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 3.32. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,515 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 3.19, a difference of 4.2%.

Average Family Size Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Micronesia	Chickasaw
Minimum	2.58	2.14
Maximum	4.26	4.35
Range	1.68	2.21
Mean	3.26	3.19
Median	3.22	3.16
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.00	3.04
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	3.38	3.32
Interquartile Range (IQR)	0.39	0.28
Standard Deviation (Sample)	0.40	0.38
Standard Deviation (Population)	0.40	0.37

Similar Demographics by Average Family Size

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia by Average Family Size

In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are British West Indian (3.32, a difference of 0.010%), Lumbee (3.32, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ecuador (3.32, a difference of 0.040%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (3.32, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Barbados (3.32, a difference of 0.070%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Average Family Size
Immigrants \| West Indies	99.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 3.33
Immigrants \| Caribbean	99.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 3.33
Yaqui	99.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Barbados	99.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 3.32
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	99.8 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Ecuador	99.8 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Micronesia	99.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 3.32
British West Indians	99.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 3.32
Lumbee	99.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Dominica	99.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 3.32
Ecuadorians	99.8 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	99.8 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Nigeria	99.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 3.32
Afghans	99.7 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 3.31

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Average Family Size

In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Portuguese (3.19, a difference of 0.0%), Cree (3.19, a difference of 0.020%), Nonimmigrants (3.19, a difference of 0.030%), Syrian (3.19, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Italy (3.19, a difference of 0.060%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Average Family Size
Pennsylvania Germans	9.3 /100 \| #219	Tragic 3.19
Lebanese	9.1 /100 \| #220	Tragic 3.19
Immigrants \| Ukraine	7.2 /100 \| #221	Tragic 3.19
Immigrants \| Kuwait	7.2 /100 \| #222	Tragic 3.19
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	7.1 /100 \| #223	Tragic 3.19
Syrians	6.5 /100 \| #224	Tragic 3.19
Cree	6.2 /100 \| #225	Tragic 3.19
Chickasaw	6.0 /100 \| #226	Tragic 3.19
Portuguese	6.0 /100 \| #227	Tragic 3.19
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	5.7 /100 \| #228	Tragic 3.19
Immigrants \| Italy	5.3 /100 \| #229	Tragic 3.19
Icelanders	5.2 /100 \| #230	Tragic 3.19
Basques	5.2 /100 \| #231	Tragic 3.19
Cherokee	4.7 /100 \| #232	Tragic 3.18
Brazilians	4.5 /100 \| #233	Tragic 3.18

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Average Family Size
Immigrants \| West Indies	99.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 3.33
Immigrants \| Caribbean	99.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 3.33
Yaqui	99.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Barbados	99.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 3.32
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	99.8 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Ecuador	99.8 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Micronesia	99.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 3.32
British West Indians	99.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 3.32
Lumbee	99.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Dominica	99.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 3.32
Ecuadorians	99.8 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	99.8 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 3.32
Immigrants \| Nigeria	99.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 3.32
Afghans	99.7 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 3.31