Apache vs Thai Family Households
COMPARE
Apache
 Thai
 Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Apache
Thais
66.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
67.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Thai Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,040,944 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 66.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,372,793 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 67.2%, a difference of 0.94%.
 
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Apache | Thai | 
| Minimum | 16.7% | 48.8% | 
| Maximum | 93.2% | 97.0% | 
| Range | 76.6% | 48.2% | 
| Mean | 66.0% | 72.7% | 
| Median | 67.9% | 71.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.1% | 66.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 77.7% | 77.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 11.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.1% | 8.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.9% | 8.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Apache and Thais by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Menominee (66.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Asian (66.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bolivia (66.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Venezuelan (66.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Arapaho (66.5%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Salvadoran (67.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Nepalese (67.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Tohono O'odham (67.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (67.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Latin America (67.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households | 
| Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #28  | Exceptional 67.4%  | 
| Nicaraguans | 100.0 /100 | #29  | Exceptional 67.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 100.0 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 67.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 100.0 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 67.2%  | 
| Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 67.2%  | 
| Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 67.2%  | 
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 67.2%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 67.1%  | 
| Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 67.1%  | 
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 67.1%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 67.0%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 67.0%  | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 100.0 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 66.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 66.6%  | 
| Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 66.5%  | 
| Apache | 100.0 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 66.5%  | 
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 66.5%  | 
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 66.5%  | 
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 66.5%  | 
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 66.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 66.4%  |