Moroccan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Father Households
COMPARE
Moroccan
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Single Father Households
Single Father Households Comparison
Moroccans
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
2.2%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,125,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,591,458 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 2.4%.
Single Father Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 0.13% | 0.87% |
| Maximum | 9.4% | 5.0% |
| Range | 9.3% | 4.1% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 0.89% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 0.90% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 0.89% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Jordanian (2.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Serbian (2.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Chile (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Jordan (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nepal (2.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Luxembourger (2.2%, a difference of 0.52%), Laotian (2.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and British (2.2%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 97.4 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 96.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Jordanians | 96.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.8 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Serbians | 96.8 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 96.6 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Poles | 96.5 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Taiwanese | 96.3 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 95.1 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Syrians | 94.8 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Chileans | 94.5 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Austrians | 94.2 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| West Indians | 94.1 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Brazilians | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| British | 92.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Laotians | 92.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 92.3 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 92.1 /100 | #143 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 90.7 /100 | #144 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 90.2 /100 | #145 | Exceptional 2.2% |