English vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children
COMPARE
English
Subsaharan African
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
English
Sub-Saharan Africans
27.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
32.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,706,985 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of English and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 27.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,337,784 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.82%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | English | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 58.3% |
| Range | 97.3% | 55.4% |
| Mean | 32.2% | 29.4% |
| Median | 29.2% | 28.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.5% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.4% | 31.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 11.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to English by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Romania (27.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Norwegian (27.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Cheyenne (27.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Crow (27.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Congo (27.3%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 37.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 27.4% |
| Swedes | 36.9 /100 | #193 | Fair 27.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 36.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 27.4% |
| Crow | 35.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 27.4% |
| Cheyenne | 35.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 27.4% |
| Norwegians | 35.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 27.4% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 34.4 /100 | #198 | Fair 27.4% |
| English | 32.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 27.3% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 28.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 27.3% |
| Bhutanese | 25.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 27.3% |
| Americans | 22.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 27.3% |
| Kiowa | 22.2 /100 | #203 | Fair 27.3% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 21.6 /100 | #204 | Fair 27.3% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 20.3 /100 | #205 | Fair 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 27.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |