Immigrants from Japan vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Subsaharan African
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Sub-Saharan Africans
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
10.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,902,345 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309 and weighted average of 27.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,337,784 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 1.6%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.0% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 52.3% | 58.3% |
Range | 51.3% | 55.4% |
Mean | 26.2% | 29.4% |
Median | 26.8% | 28.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 31.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 11.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Greek (27.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Austrian (27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), New Zealander (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Cuban (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Dominica | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 27.2% |
Okinawans | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 27.2% |
Africans | 13.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 27.2% |
Northern Europeans | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 27.2% |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |