Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,425,181 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186 and weighted average of 26.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,337,784 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 2.6%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Kazakhstan	Subsaharan African
Minimum	5.2%	3.0%
Maximum	53.2%	58.3%
Range	48.0%	55.4%
Mean	26.7%	29.4%
Median	26.8%	28.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	23.3%	25.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.0%	31.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.7%	5.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.2%	11.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.2%	11.0%

Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Potawatomi (26.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (26.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Belgian (26.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Jamaican (26.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (26.8%, a difference of 0.080%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Navajo	3.2 /100 \| #241	Tragic 26.9%
Immigrants \| England	3.2 /100 \| #242	Tragic 26.9%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	2.9 /100 \| #243	Tragic 26.9%
Ukrainians	2.9 /100 \| #244	Tragic 26.9%
Australians	2.8 /100 \| #245	Tragic 26.9%
Jamaicans	2.5 /100 \| #246	Tragic 26.9%
Potawatomi	2.2 /100 \| #247	Tragic 26.9%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	2.2 /100 \| #248	Tragic 26.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	2.1 /100 \| #249	Tragic 26.9%
Belgians	2.1 /100 \| #250	Tragic 26.9%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	1.9 /100 \| #251	Tragic 26.8%
Irish	1.8 /100 \| #252	Tragic 26.8%
Italians	1.5 /100 \| #253	Tragic 26.8%
Immigrants \| Scotland	1.5 /100 \| #254	Tragic 26.8%
German Russians	1.5 /100 \| #255	Tragic 26.8%

Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	75.6 /100 \| #153	Good 27.6%
Icelanders	75.3 /100 \| #154	Good 27.6%
Comanche	74.8 /100 \| #155	Good 27.6%
Hungarians	74.6 /100 \| #156	Good 27.6%
Indians (Asian)	71.6 /100 \| #157	Good 27.6%
Romanians	70.8 /100 \| #158	Good 27.6%
Mongolians	70.7 /100 \| #159	Good 27.6%
Sub-Saharan Africans	67.5 /100 \| #160	Good 27.6%
Alaskan Athabascans	67.1 /100 \| #161	Good 27.6%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	67.0 /100 \| #162	Good 27.6%
Czechs	65.3 /100 \| #163	Good 27.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	64.9 /100 \| #164	Good 27.5%
Immigrants \| South Africa	61.3 /100 \| #165	Good 27.5%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	61.2 /100 \| #166	Good 27.5%
Dominicans	61.1 /100 \| #167	Good 27.5%