Romanian vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Romanian
Subsaharan African
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Romanians
Sub-Saharan Africans
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
70.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,533,387 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,337,784 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.080%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 76.1% | 58.3% |
| Range | 72.4% | 55.4% |
| Mean | 29.3% | 29.4% |
| Median | 27.0% | 28.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.0% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.7% | 31.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Comanche (27.6%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Menominee | 78.9 /100 | #149 | Good 27.6% |
| Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
| Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
| Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |