Alaskan Athabascan vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Subsaharan African
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Sub-Saharan Africans
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,006 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,337,784 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.010%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 58.3% |
| Range | 56.7% | 55.4% |
| Mean | 25.9% | 29.4% |
| Median | 25.8% | 28.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.1% | 31.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
| Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
| Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |