Israeli vs Czech Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Israeli
Czech
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Israelis
Czechs
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
53.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
65.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Czech Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,876,697 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.720 and weighted average of 27.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,223,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 27.5%, a difference of 0.26%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Czech |
| Minimum | 12.3% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 69.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.9% | 98.1% |
| Mean | 31.3% | 27.9% |
| Median | 28.5% | 27.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.1% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.7% | 29.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis and Czechs by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Blackfeet (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (27.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Cherokee (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Seminole (27.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
| Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
| Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
| British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
| Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |