Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs South American Indian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
South American Indian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
South American Indians
65.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs South American Indian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,689,020 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 65.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,449 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394 and weighted average of 64.6%, a difference of 0.80%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | South American Indian |
Minimum | 45.9% | 42.9% |
Maximum | 96.3% | 88.8% |
Range | 50.3% | 45.9% |
Mean | 69.0% | 69.0% |
Median | 67.0% | 70.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.5% | 64.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.1% | 75.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 9.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Haitian (65.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Chilean (65.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Spaniard (65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and Central American Indian (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Czechoslovakian (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Welsh (64.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (64.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |