Palestinian vs Indian (Asian) Family Households
COMPARE
Palestinian
Indian (Asian)
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Palestinians
Indians (Asian)
65.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Indian (Asian) Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,401,165 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 65.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,783,710 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 65.1%, a difference of 0.090%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 47.7% | 36.8% |
| Maximum | 88.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 41.1% | 63.2% |
| Mean | 67.8% | 68.4% |
| Median | 66.8% | 68.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.2% | 63.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.8% | 76.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Indians (Asian) by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are White/Caucasian (65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaska Native (65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), English (65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Scandinavian (65.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Spaniard (65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Haitian (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Chilean (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and English (65.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |