Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Mexican American Indian Family Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,896,995 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155 and weighted average of 66.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,495,580 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.378 and weighted average of 67.0%, a difference of 1.3%.

Family Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Hong Kong	Mexican American Indian
Minimum	40.7%	41.6%
Maximum	93.8%	85.0%
Range	53.1%	43.4%
Mean	70.3%	66.1%
Median	70.5%	67.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	65.1%	62.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	75.9%	71.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.8%	8.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.9%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.9%	9.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Mexican American Indians by Family Households

In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Pennsylvania German (66.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (66.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Colombian (66.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Afghan (66.3%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from El Salvador (67.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Tsimshian (67.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (66.6%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Bolivia (66.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and Menominee (66.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households
Tsimshian	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 67.1%
Mexican American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 67.0%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 67.0%
Guamanians/Chamorros	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 66.6%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 66.6%
Menominee	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 66.5%
Apache	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 66.5%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 66.5%
Venezuelans	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 66.5%
Arapaho	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 66.5%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 66.5%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 66.4%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 66.4%
Navajo	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 66.4%
Natives/Alaskans	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 66.4%
Colombians	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 66.3%
Afghans	100.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 66.3%
Immigrants \| Colombia	100.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 66.3%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	100.0 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 66.1%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 66.1%
Pennsylvania Germans	100.0 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 66.1%