Cuban vs Mexican American Indian Family Households
COMPARE
Cuban
Mexican American Indian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Cubans
Mexican American Indians
67.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
67.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Mexican American Indian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,974,040 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479 and weighted average of 67.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,495,580 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.378 and weighted average of 67.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 46.6% | 41.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 85.0% |
Range | 53.4% | 43.4% |
Mean | 70.2% | 66.1% |
Median | 70.5% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.3% | 62.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.6% | 71.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Mexican American Indians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Sri Lankan (67.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Inupiat (67.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Pakistan (67.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (67.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (67.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from El Salvador (67.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Tsimshian (67.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Peruvian (67.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Tohono O'odham (67.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Salvadoran (67.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Nicaraguans | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 67.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 67.0% |