Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Pima Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Pima
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Pima
66.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Pima Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,896,995 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155 and weighted average of 66.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.31%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Pima |
| Minimum | 40.7% | 40.4% |
| Maximum | 93.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.1% | 59.6% |
| Mean | 70.3% | 69.9% |
| Median | 70.5% | 68.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.1% | 63.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 76.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Pima by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Pennsylvania German (66.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |