Immigrants from China vs Polish Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Polish
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Immigrants from China
Poles
48.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
48.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Polish Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,566,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 48.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,940,539 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 48.5%, a difference of 0.28%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Polish |
Minimum | 26.3% | 19.1% |
Maximum | 73.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 47.4% | 80.9% |
Mean | 51.2% | 53.2% |
Median | 51.3% | 50.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.9% | 46.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.7% | 56.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 15.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Poles by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Jordanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from North America (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Indonesia (48.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Czechoslovakian (48.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (48.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Austrian (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Austrians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Poles | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Jordanians | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Romanians | 98.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | China | 98.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | North America | 98.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Laotians | 98.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 98.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 48.3% |