Immigrants from Liberia vs Scandinavian Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,222,977 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,042,007 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 0.88%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Liberia	Scandinavian
Minimum	10.6%	8.1%
Maximum	37.5%	100.0%
Range	26.9%	91.9%
Mean	27.4%	32.9%
Median	28.0%	28.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	25.1%	23.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.4%	36.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	13.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	18.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	17.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia and Scandinavians by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Chickasaw (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (28.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.19%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Liberia	99.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 28.2%
Chickasaw	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 28.2%
Panamanians	99.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Colombia	99.2 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 28.2%
Ute	99.1 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 28.2%
Chileans	98.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	98.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%