Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Syrian Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,235,396 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,095,178 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 27.8%, a difference of 0.85%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar	Syrian
Minimum	12.1%	3.8%
Maximum	44.7%	78.9%
Range	32.6%	75.1%
Mean	29.5%	29.0%
Median	28.3%	27.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.9%	21.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	33.1%	30.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	8.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.7%	15.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.6%	14.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Syrians by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Belizean (27.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (27.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Singapore (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Ecuadorian (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (27.8%, a difference of 0.14%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 27.8%
Ecuadorians	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	90.5 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 27.8%
Belizeans	90.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 27.8%
Syrians	89.7 /100 \| #128	Excellent 27.8%