Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Lithuanian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Lithuanians
62.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
23.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,273,179 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 62.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,743,433 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092 and weighted average of 64.0%, a difference of 2.4%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e373/9e3736c14a1de62828428c78a5a5a8aac0527f43" alt="Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Lithuanian Family Households"
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 49.1% | 27.6% |
Maximum | 86.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 37.1% | 72.4% |
Mean | 63.7% | 65.5% |
Median | 62.5% | 65.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.1% | 58.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.0% | 71.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 13.6% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are U.S. Virgin Islander (62.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (62.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sweden (62.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Nepal (62.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Barbadian (62.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
Latvians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 62.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 62.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 62.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 62.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 62.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 62.6% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 62.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 62.5% |
Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 62.5% |
Slovenes | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 62.4% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 62.4% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are French (64.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Arab (64.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Zimbabwean (64.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Asia (64.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Paiute (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Iran | 30.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 64.1% |
Spanish Americans | 30.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 64.1% |
Northern Europeans | 28.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 64.1% |
Paraguayans | 26.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 64.1% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 25.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 64.1% |
Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |