New Zealander vs Iroquois Married-couple Households
COMPARE
New Zealander
Iroquois
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
New Zealanders
Iroquois
47.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Iroquois Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,894,441 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082 and weighted average of 47.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%, a difference of 7.9%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Iroquois |
Minimum | 22.7% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 86.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.3% | 90.4% |
Mean | 54.6% | 45.4% |
Median | 54.4% | 46.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.3% | 40.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 63.4% | 52.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.8% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 17.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Malaysia (47.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (47.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (47.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Greece (47.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Argentina (47.2%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Iraq | 87.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 87.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 47.3% |
South Africans | 86.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Greece | 86.0 /100 | #134 | Excellent 47.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 86.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 47.2% |
New Zealanders | 85.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 47.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 85.2 /100 | #137 | Excellent 47.2% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 85.1 /100 | #138 | Excellent 47.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 84.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 47.2% |
Spanish | 84.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 47.2% |
Costa Ricans | 84.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 47.2% |
Spaniards | 84.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 47.2% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 47.2% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |