Guatemalan vs Iroquois Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Iroquois
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Guatemalans
Iroquois
43.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Iroquois Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,284,876 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 43.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 11.2% | 9.6% |
| Maximum | 67.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.3% | 90.4% |
| Mean | 42.0% | 45.4% |
| Median | 41.9% | 46.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.1% | 40.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.1% | 52.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 17.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Iroquois by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Yuman (43.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Ethiopian (43.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Nigerian (43.2%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |