Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Households
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ethiopians
Immigrants from Middle Africa
61.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,101,453 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 61.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,657,833 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 61.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Minimum | 43.8% | 38.1% |
Maximum | 92.3% | 80.2% |
Range | 48.5% | 42.1% |
Mean | 64.2% | 63.6% |
Median | 62.0% | 62.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.9% | 60.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.5% | 68.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from France (61.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (61.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (61.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (61.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Cambodian (61.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 61.3% |
Ethiopians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 61.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 61.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 61.1% |