English vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households
COMPARE
English
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
English
Immigrants from Oceania
65.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 579,316,298 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of English and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 65.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 0.28%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | English | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 42.7% | 8.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 91.4% |
| Range | 57.3% | 82.6% |
| Mean | 73.0% | 64.5% |
| Median | 70.3% | 67.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.8% | 62.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.2% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to English and Immigrants from Oceania by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to English are White/Caucasian (65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaska Native (65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Indian (Asian) (65.1%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Ecuadorian (65.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |