Chippewa vs Immigrants from Sweden Family Households
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Sweden
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Sweden
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Sweden Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,001,181 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 62.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,705,416 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091 and weighted average of 62.5%, a difference of 0.67%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Sweden |
Minimum | 25.0% | 29.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 75.0% | 70.6% |
Mean | 65.2% | 66.1% |
Median | 63.9% | 64.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.0% | 60.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.6% | 69.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Immigrants from Sweden by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), African (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Barbadian (62.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Okinawan (62.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Slovene (62.4%, a difference of 0.090%), French American Indian (62.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (62.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 62.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 62.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 62.6% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 62.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 62.5% |
Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 62.5% |
Slovenes | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 62.4% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |