Cambodian vs Iroquois Average Family Size
COMPARE
Cambodian
 Iroquois
 Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Cambodians
Iroquois
3.15
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.16
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cambodian vs Iroquois Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,468,433 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 3.15. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,368 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 3.16, a difference of 0.14%.
 
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cambodian | Iroquois | 
| Minimum | 2.52 | 1.73 | 
| Maximum | 3.87 | 4.68 | 
| Range | 1.35 | 2.95 | 
| Mean | 3.05 | 3.07 | 
| Median | 3.04 | 3.10 | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.86 | 2.82 | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.22 | 3.34 | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.36 | 0.52 | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.28 | 0.50 | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.27 | 0.50 | 
Demographics Similar to Cambodians and Iroquois by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Immigrants from Belgium (3.15, a difference of 0.0%), New Zealander (3.15, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (3.15, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (3.15, a difference of 0.040%), and Tlingit-Haida (3.16, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Greece (3.16, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (3.16, a difference of 0.030%), Maltese (3.16, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Singapore (3.16, a difference of 0.050%), and American (3.16, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 1.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 1.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 1.0 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Americans | 1.0 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 0.9 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 0.9 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Iroquois | 0.8 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Maltese | 0.8 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | Singapore | 0.7 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.7 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.7 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.15 | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 0.6 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.15 | 
| New Zealanders | 0.6 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.15 | 
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.6 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.15 | 
| Cambodians | 0.6 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.15 | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.5 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.15 | 
| Swiss | 0.5 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.15 | 
| Okinawans | 0.5 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.15 | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 0.5 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.15 | 
| Immigrants | England | 0.4 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.15 | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 0.4 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.15 |