Bhutanese vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from South Africa
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from South Africa
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
5.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,270,946 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 63.7%, a difference of 3.4%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from South Africa |
| Minimum | 36.6% | 23.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 63.4% | 76.2% |
| Mean | 69.5% | 66.2% |
| Median | 69.4% | 64.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.7% | 56.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 70.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 18.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 17.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belarus (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), French Canadian (63.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |