Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Choctaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Choctaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs
Choctaw
51.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
24.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Choctaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,294,582 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 51.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,626,199 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202 and weighted average of 46.0%, a difference of 12.7%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac | Choctaw |
Minimum | 29.2% | 19.5% |
Maximum | 84.7% | 64.6% |
Range | 55.5% | 45.1% |
Mean | 54.9% | 45.2% |
Median | 53.4% | 45.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 48.9% | 42.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.3% | 49.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Thai (51.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Tongan (51.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Taiwan (52.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Danish (51.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and Filipino (51.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 52.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 52.4% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 51.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 51.8% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 51.6% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 51.1% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (46.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Latvia (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |
Brazilians | 35.9 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.2% |
Albanians | 31.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.1% |
Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |