Alaskan Athabascan vs Ute Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
 Ute
 Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Ute
7.3%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ute Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,772,365 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,640,483 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.575 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 2.9%.
 
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Ute | 
| Minimum | 0.67% | 2.4% | 
| Maximum | 35.3% | 31.1% | 
| Range | 34.6% | 28.6% | 
| Mean | 10.9% | 7.6% | 
| Median | 7.5% | 5.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 7.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 2.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 6.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 6.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Ute by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Malaysian (7.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Africa (7.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Bermudan (7.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Cajun (7.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Panamanian (7.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Kiowa (7.1%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (7.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Panama (7.2%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households | 
| Chickasaw | 1.4 /100 | #234  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 1.4 /100 | #235  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Ute | 1.0 /100 | #236  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Arapaho | 1.0 /100 | #237  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #238  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.8 /100 | #239  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.7 /100 | #240  | Tragic 7.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.6 /100 | #241  | Tragic 7.2%  | 
| Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #242  | Tragic 7.2%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 0.6 /100 | #243  | Tragic 7.2%  | 
| Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #244  | Tragic 7.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.5 /100 | #245  | Tragic 7.2%  | 
| Nicaraguans | 0.5 /100 | #246  | Tragic 7.2%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #247  | Tragic 7.3%  | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #248  | Tragic 7.3%  | 
| Bermudans | 0.4 /100 | #249  | Tragic 7.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.4 /100 | #250  | Tragic 7.3%  | 
| Malaysians | 0.3 /100 | #251  | Tragic 7.3%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #252  | Tragic 7.3%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.3 /100 | #253  | Tragic 7.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #254  | Tragic 7.3%  |