Immigrants from Sudan vs Ute Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Ute
Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Ute
6.9%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Ute Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,904,005 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.320 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,640,483 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.575 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 3.2%.
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Ute |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 13.0% | 31.1% |
| Range | 11.9% | 28.6% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 7.6% |
| Median | 6.5% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan and Ute by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Micronesia (6.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Sudanese (6.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Thailand (6.9%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Panamanian (7.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Kiowa (7.1%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (7.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Panama (7.2%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Paiute | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Kenyans | 2.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 2.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 2.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Creek | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Spanish Americans | 1.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Comanche | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Choctaw | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Chickasaw | 1.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 1.4 /100 | #235 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Ute | 1.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 7.2% |