Alaskan Athabascan vs Ute Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Ute
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Ute
17.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ute Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,576,006 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,537,245 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 22.6%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Ute |
Minimum | 3.4% | 9.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 86.0% |
Range | 96.6% | 76.9% |
Mean | 37.8% | 34.2% |
Median | 24.1% | 26.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 63.6% | 45.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 48.6% | 27.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.5% | 21.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.2% | 21.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Malaysian (17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Armenia (17.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants (17.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Aleut (17.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Thailand (17.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 13.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 13.3 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.3% |
Ugandans | 12.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.3% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 11.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
German Russians | 10.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 8.2 /100 | #207 | Tragic 17.5% |
Malaysians | 7.6 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 7.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 6.8 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 6.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Creek (21.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 21.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 21.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.2% |