Alaskan Athabascan vs British Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
British
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
British
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs British Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,006 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,729,097 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 27.4%, a difference of 0.39%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | British |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.7% | 95.6% |
| Mean | 25.9% | 28.9% |
| Median | 25.8% | 27.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 21.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.1% | 34.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 13.8% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and British by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from China (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Ugandan (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish American (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Argentina (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
| Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
| Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
| British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
| Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |
| Spanish Americans | 48.9 /100 | #178 | Average 27.4% |