Filipino vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Filipino
Chinese
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Filipinos
Chinese
11.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,988,571 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,708,230 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 6.8%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.83% | 0.70% |
Maximum | 19.0% | 58.3% |
Range | 18.1% | 57.6% |
Mean | 7.9% | 14.1% |
Median | 7.5% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 17.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Chinese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (11.0%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from India (10.9%, a difference of 2.3%), Thai (11.7%, a difference of 5.1%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |