Inupiat vs Lumbee Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Inupiat
Lumbee
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Inupiat
Lumbee
34.5%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.7%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Lumbee Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,264,224 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 34.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,106,764 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 32.7%, a difference of 5.5%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Lumbee |
Minimum | 17.6% | 15.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 57.9% |
Range | 82.4% | 42.5% |
Mean | 45.8% | 36.3% |
Median | 38.4% | 37.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.4% | 30.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.0% | 42.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.6% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.4% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Lumbee by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Navajo (33.3%, a difference of 3.6%), Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 4.3%), Tohono O'odham (36.0%, a difference of 4.3%), Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and Kiowa (32.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (32.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Alaskan Athabascan (32.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Houma (32.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 30.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 30.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 30.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 32.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 32.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 32.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 33.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 33.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 34.5% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 37.8% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 38.6% |