Yakama vs Houma Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Yakama
Houma
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Yakama
Houma
29.6%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.3%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Houma Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,894,634 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 29.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,769,608 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 32.3%, a difference of 9.0%.

Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Houma |
| Minimum | 7.0% | 18.4% |
| Maximum | 54.0% | 74.2% |
| Range | 47.0% | 55.8% |
| Mean | 29.8% | 38.1% |
| Median | 29.8% | 32.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.6% | 28.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.9% | 47.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 19.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 13.8% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Houma by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Apache (29.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch West Indian (29.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Seminole (29.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Hopi (30.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and Puerto Rican (29.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Alaskan Athabascan (32.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Kiowa (32.6%, a difference of 0.81%), Lumbee (32.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and Yuman (31.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 29.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 29.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 29.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 30.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 32.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 32.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 32.9% |