Uruguayan vs Arab Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Arab
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Uruguayans
Arabs
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Arab Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,780,979 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,612,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Uruguayan | Arab |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 23.8% | 17.8% |
| Range | 20.9% | 15.3% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 7.0% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Arabs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |