Turkish vs Tongan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
 Tongan
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Turks
Tongans
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Tongan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,801,732 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,876,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Tongan | 
| Minimum | 0.92% | 0.94% | 
| Maximum | 11.5% | 16.9% | 
| Range | 10.6% | 16.0% | 
| Mean | 5.7% | 5.8% | 
| Median | 5.2% | 5.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 6.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Turks and Tongans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 5.5%  |