Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tongan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Tongan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Tongans
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tongan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,955,040 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,876,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.89%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Tongan |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.94% |
| Maximum | 8.4% | 16.9% |
| Range | 7.4% | 16.0% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 5.8% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Tongans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |