Turkish vs Central American Indian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
Central American Indian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Turks
Central American Indians
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Central American Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,801,732 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,071,152 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.616 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 30.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Central American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 11.5% | 32.9% |
| Range | 10.6% | 30.3% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 9.9% |
| Median | 5.2% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Turks by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Ottawa (7.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Shoshone (7.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Blackfeet (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Yemen (7.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |