Turkish vs Immigrants from Indonesia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
 Immigrants from Indonesia
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Indonesia
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Indonesia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,801,732 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,776,699 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Indonesia | 
| Minimum | 0.92% | 0.92% | 
| Maximum | 11.5% | 16.9% | 
| Range | 10.6% | 16.0% | 
| Mean | 5.7% | 6.5% | 
| Median | 5.2% | 5.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 7.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 3.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 3.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Indonesia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Paraguayan (5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sweden (5.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Egyptian (5.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Japan (5.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Argentina (5.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 5.6%  |