Turkish vs Immigrants from Kuwait Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Kuwait
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Kuwait
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Kuwait Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,801,732 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,900,049 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Kuwait |
Minimum | 0.92% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 11.5% | 9.4% |
Range | 10.6% | 8.1% |
Mean | 5.7% | 4.8% |
Median | 5.2% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 5.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Kuwait by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kuwait are Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |