Turkish vs Cherokee Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Turkish
Cherokee
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Turks
Cherokee
9.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Cherokee Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,671,610 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,305,636 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 60.1%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 23.1% | 61.8% |
| Range | 21.2% | 57.4% |
| Mean | 9.7% | 25.2% |
| Median | 8.7% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 28.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Turks by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Indonesia (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Bulgarian (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Cuba (9.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Turkey (9.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Navajo (15.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Cajun (15.3%, a difference of 0.75%), Pueblo (15.3%, a difference of 0.93%), Native/Alaskan (15.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |